Eurovision 2016: thinking out loud and favorites

Well this time Eurovision 2016 somehow disappointed me. The rooms are all as one as a blueprint, and yes, Nor, for that matter business, Russian number is not at all impressed nirazu. “All this I have seen in the past year!” – I said to myself. Of course, room Lazarev 1 in 1 copied from the last winner. Yes I Am, and why every time Russia sends popular crooners to this competition, while, both from other countries come all sorts of welders, storekeepers and cooks, for whom music – it's just a hobby. Also, this time attended by so many groups, that's just all, who plays the instruments on stage, as if in fact they do not play a, but just pretend. Anyone, who heard the live music, will understand, live music that somehow would sound impure lazhi, and it will all be heard in one channel and mixed with vocals, other instruments and noise – just like if you listen to the sounds of the city outside the window.

Of course, involved in the show policy, and, I think, that the outcome of the tournament has long been defined by someone, who from this will benefit all. Let us turn to the same objective, independent assessment and nevatnoy – my humble opinion.

And So, in my ideal world, on an objective assessment of wins – Belgium

Number of quality delivered, otrepetirovan. Vocals – acceptable. Music – dynamic, the original.

Then there is the Austrian nyasha, singing in French, I do not know

Number cheerful, song – the original. execution – a good, in addition, sing in French harder. But, I confess, I just liked the girl.

Well, surely, I note another favorite – Poland. Igor Nikolaev scored these great vocals. And the song is clearly partially copied from Russian motives. But it is very melodious music, harmony of interest, and the song itself is quite strong.

Loading

This entry was posted in Audio, Vocal / Singing, The Arts, The Culture, Music, Music, News and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. | Short link:  http://p1rat.ru/lezzz/FlUoX

Leave a Reply